Back to Blog
Teal illustrated cover image reading ā€˜Love, Decoded: When Communication Issues Aren't About Communication’.

When Communication Issues Aren't About Communication

coercive control communication issues confusion in relationships emotional abuse emotional withdrawal gaslighting high functioning women love decoded power dynamics relationship clarity relationship psychology self doubt self trust unhealthy relationships Feb 05, 2026

She didn’t think of herself as someone who struggled with relationships.

That was the uncomfortable part.

Her life, on paper, worked. She worked. People trusted her. She made decisions all day long and rarely questioned them. When something went wrong, she knew how to assess it, adjust, and move forward.

So when her relationship started to feel destabilising, she assumed the issue was something small. Fixable. A misunderstanding she hadn’t quite articulated properly yet.

She told herself it was a communication thing.

That if she could just find the right words - calmer, clearer, more carefully chosen - things would settle.

At first, she tried to talk.

Not dramatically. Not aggressively. Just enough to say, something here doesn’t feel right.

Sometimes the response was irritation.
Sometimes defensiveness.
Sometimes silence that stretched longer than the conversation itself.

It didn’t always escalate.
It didn’t always stay quiet.

But it always felt the same way.

The atmosphere shifted. The room felt different. And she found herself wanting to get out of it as quickly as possible.

She started replaying conversations after they ended.

Not obsessively. Just… thoroughly.

She could tell you exactly what she’d said, what he’d said back, and the moment things went wrong. She could pinpoint the sentence that changed his tone, the question that seemed to tip something over.

She analysed because that’s what she did when something stopped making sense.

But clarity never came.

Because the problem wasn’t what she was saying.

It was what happened after she spoke.

Over time, she noticed she was choosing her moments more carefully.

Not because she was afraid - she wouldn’t have described it that way - but because she was tired of the fallout.

Sometimes the fallout was an argument that went nowhere.
Sometimes it was a withdrawal she couldn’t quite name.
Sometimes it was a flatness that made the rest of the evening feel wrong.

So she adapted.

She raised things less often.
She softened them when she did.
She told herself certain topics weren’t worth it.

From the outside, it looked like compromise.

From the inside, it felt like constant self-monitoring.

What confused her most was how contained all of this felt.

There was no single incident she could point to. No obvious line that had been crossed. Nothing dramatic enough to justify how much she’d changed around him.

She still functioned.
Still laughed with friends.
Still did well at work.

But inside the relationship, something had narrowed.

She stopped trusting her reactions.
Stopped knowing whether she was being reasonable or too much.
Stopped feeling confident that speaking would lead anywhere useful.

And because she was competent everywhere else, she quietly assumed the fault lay with her.

This is the part that rarely gets named.

When someone consistently responds to discomfort - whether with conflict, shutdown, or withdrawal - the relationship teaches a lesson.

Not verbally.
Not intentionally.

But clearly.

It teaches you that honesty has consequences.

And when honesty repeatedly leads to distance, tension, or punishment, the nervous system doesn’t wait for logic to catch up. It adapts.

Speaking becomes effortful.
Silence becomes safer.
Relief gets mistaken for resolution.

The relationship stops being a place where things are worked through and becomes a place where they’re managed.

That’s not a communication breakdown.

It’s a condition where one person holds the power to end closeness by deciding when conversations are allowed to exist.

This is why trying harder never worked.

Why explaining yourself more carefully didn’t bring relief.

Why being calm and reasonable didn’t restore balance.

Because the issue was never clarity of expression.

It was the cost attached to expression itself.

And the more thoughtful and accommodating she became, the easier it was for that pattern to continue without being named.

She didn’t lose her intelligence.

She learned where it wasn’t welcome.

And once she could see that, something important shifted.

Not emotionally.
Cognitively.

The confusion stopped being personal.

If you recognise yourself here

If this essay put words to something you’ve been circling for a while, the next step isn’t to revisit every conversation or try to interpret it differently.

It’s to map the pattern clearly.

The Relationship Mirror Toolkit is designed to help you step out of the emotion and look at what actually happened - how the responses played out over time, how you adapted, and why it made sense that you did.

It doesn’t ask you to relive the relationship.
It helps you understand it accurately, so the confusion doesn’t follow you forward.

You can access it for free via the link below.

[Click here for the toolkit]

I’d love to hear from you with your thoughts about this blog.
Email me at [email protected] with your feedback, experiences, and ideas for other blog posts you’d like to see coming your way.

Eve x
Founder, The Healthy Relationship Company

šŸ‘€ Follow along on Instagram and TikTok for daily clarity hits
šŸ“§ Contact: [email protected]

Stay in the loop!

Get psychology-backed relationship tips straight to your inbox.

We hate spam. We will never sell your information, for any reason. By subscribing to The Clarity Drop Newsletter, you also agree to receive occasional updates and marketing. We will only send things that would be genuinely useful to you. Unsubscribe at any time.